snapdragon 835 vs exynos 9810

Trova cellulare. Il CERCAFONINO è l'unico strumento che ti permette di cercare cellulari e smartphone in base alle tue esigenze, con le caratteristiche tecniche per te rilevanti. Il trova Supports 11% higher memory bandwidth (29.8 against 26.82 GB/s) Benchmarks Performance tests in popular benchmarks SoC: Exynos 9810 vs Snapdragon 845 AnTuTu 9 The AnTuTu Benchmark measures CPU, GPU, RAM, and I/O performance in different scenarios Exynos 9810 +3% 413908 Snapdragon 845 401149 ️ Submit your AnTuTu result GeekBench 5 Coming to the main differences, Exynos chips are usually Octa-core whereas Snapdragon chips are Quad-Core chips. While Exynos processors have more chips, Snapdragon chips can be overclocked and achieve much higher processing speeds than the Exynos ones. So, overall the processing power is balanced out between the two processors. My wifes exynos s9+ is at 74% battery after 11 hours. Seems allright for normal usage. Unless you compare it to the Snapdragon in the U11 for example, which after a hard day including Google Maps Samsung Exynos 9810 @ 1.8 GHz 593 OnePlus Nord Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G @ 1.8 GHz 592 Huawei P40 Lite HiSilicon Kirin 810 @ 1.9 GHz 589 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 @ 1.9 GHz 1390 Huawei Honor View 10 HiSilicon Kirin 970 @ 1.8 GHz 1387 Samsung Galaxy Tab S5e Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 @ 1.7 GHz 1385 Mit Frauen Flirten Und Sie Verführen. Home Mobile Exynos and Snapdragon have been neck and neck for years, but according to Geekbench, there's definitely a winner. Smartphones get more powerful every year, and with big hitters like the Samsung Galaxy S23 around the corner, we thought it would be pertinent to take a trip down memory lane and contextualize where these performance improvements really come from. Geekbench scores are a great way to get a high-level overview of the computational improvements from one generation to the next. They don't tell us anything else about a chipset or its power consumption, but they serve as a solid point of comparison. The data collected here comes from Geekbench 5 scores of every Samsung flagship from the Galaxy S5 onwards, and it's created from a median of 250 benchmarks run on each base device. This removes outliers and accounts for more powerful or even weaker devices that spoof legitimate Samsung phones. As expected, each generation nets performance improvements, but the results are an interesting look into the progression of smartphones over the years. About the data The data was collected for each unlocked device, and the model numbers are listed below. While Geekbench doesn't cover all aspects of a chipset, you'll find comparisons between CPU capabilities of each chip below. We display the median of the results in our graphs, and the computed median was always close to the computed mean. Device Chipset Model Samsung Galaxy S5 Snapdragon 801 SM-G900F Samsung Galaxy S5 Exynos 5422 SM-G900H Samsung Galaxy S5 Snapdragon 805 SM-G901F Samsung Galaxy S6 Exynos 7420 SM-G920F Samsung Galaxy S7 Exynos 8890 SM-G930L Samsung Galaxy S7 Snapdragon 820 SM-G930A Samsung Galaxy S8 Exynos 8895 SM-G950N Samsung Galaxy S8 Snapdragon 835 SM-G950U Samsung Galaxy S9 Exynos 9810 SM-G960F Samsung Galaxy S9 Snapdragon 845 SM-G960U1 Samsung Galaxy S10 Exynos 9820 SM-G973F Samsung Galaxy S10 Snapdragon 855 SM-G973U Samsung Galaxy S20 Exynos 990 SM-G986B Samsung Galaxy S20 Snapdragon 865 SM-G980F Samsung Galaxy S21 Exynos 2100 SM-G991N Samsung Galaxy S21 Snapdragon 888 SM-G9910 Samsung Galaxy S22 Exynos 2200 SM-S901B Samsung Galaxy S22 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM-S901E About Geekbench Geekbench is a CPU-centric test that uses several computational workloads including encryption, compression text and images, rendering, physics simulations, computer vision, ray tracing, speech recognition, and convolutional neural network inference on images. The score breakdown gives specific metrics. The final score is weighted according to the designer’s considerations, placing a large emphasis on integer performance 65%, then float performance 30%, and finally, cryptography 5%. It does not account for other improvements in the SoC or power consumption. Samsung Galaxy Exynos devices The progression of the company's Exynos processors since the Galaxy S5 has been interesting to look at. The Exynos 5422 is nowhere near what we would nowadays call a powerhouse, with a measly score of 176 in single-core and an equally weedy score of 322 in multi-core. For context, the Samsung Galaxy S22 with its Exynos 2200 SoC boasts just shy of a 10x improvement in multi-core speeds and a improvement in single-core speeds over the original Exynos 5422 that powered the Galaxy S5. That's a pretty major improvement as expected but shows how improvements are beginning to slow, as eight generations on, we don't see an 8x improvement in single-core scores. The jump from the Exynos 8895 to the 9810 was probably the biggest overall, with a large increase in single and multi-core performance. This particular score jump is likely due to the switch from Exynos M2 cores to Exynos M3 cores and an upgrade from Cortex A53 cores to Cortex A55. With an increase in cache size from 2MB to 4MB as well, we would see a decrease in cache miss rates and, in turn, a further improvement in performance as the CPU should be able to fetch more instructions from the cache instead of from the slower main memory. Further generations found a more even footing, with smaller but consistent increases of roughly 20% each time in single and multi-core performance. Samsung Galaxy Snapdragon devices Snapdragon chipsets are the cream of the crop in the Android world, and just like with the above Exynos results, these results show how far Qualcomm has come over the years. Starting off with single and multi-core scores of 156 and 445, respectively, we see massive leaps in both peaks with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 and the Snapdragon 888. Given that the Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 has its own fair share of problems, it's not too surprising to see it fall behind a little bit in the single-core department. Interestingly, in contrast to the Exynos chipsets, there aren't any major jumps from one generation to the next. Instead, it's a relatively smooth and consistent improvement year over year. You may also notice that the Samsung Galaxy S6 is missing this is likely because of the problems that the Snapdragon 810 faced. It was the first 64-bit chip from Qualcommm and would overheat quite severely. It was even blamed for why the Nexus 5X and Nexus 6P faced major bootlooping problems. Samsung instead went with Exynos for global devices that generation. However, one thing is for sure Qualcomm has always scored ahead of the same generation Exynos chipset in every Samsung device except in the case of the Exynos 2100. Samsung Galaxy Exynos and Snapdragon devices For the wider context of how Snapdragon and Exynos compare across generations, it's clear that they've always been close in performance. There is never a major digression in these chipsets' capabilities, with differences usually boiling down to power consumption or real-world performance. In normal usage, they are more or less equally comparable, and the difference in results between these chipsets can similarly be found between two results run on the same device in different conditions. In short, these results show the neck-and-neck nature of the chipset performance race and how both Qualcomm and Samsung keep up with each other. Samsung appears to lag behind a little bit, but for the most part, both do quite well and Samsung is never too far behind Qualcomm in terms of its actual performance. There are many other ways to measure a chipset, and Geekbench measures one sole aspect of a device. We're looking forward to the Samsung Galaxy S23 series, and with rumors suggesting a Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, it's possible that there may not even be an Exynos variant this year. We'll see! Samsung Exynos 9810 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9810 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced early 2018 and should be integrated in the upcoming Samsung Galaxy S9 series at least partly. It integrates eight CPU cores octa core in two clusters. The performance cluster integrates four Samsung M3 at GHz and the power efficiency cluster four small ARM Cortex-A55 cores at GHz. The Samsung M3 cores are based on Samsungs own design and now offer a wider pipeline, improved cache memory and bigger caches. This leads to a twice as fast single-core performance and a 40 percent improved multi-core performance according to Samsung most likely compared to the previous Exynos 8898. The integrated LTE modem also got a siginifcant upgrade and now supports LTE for up to Gbps download and 200 Mbps upload. This is achieved with 6x20 MHz CA, 256-QAM in download and 2x20 MHz in upload. As a GPU, Samsung integrates a ARM Mali G72MP18 only 18 clusters, compared to the 20 clusters of the predecessor G71MP20. Most likely Samsung increases performance due to a higher core clock of the graphics card. The memory controller looks similar to the 8898 and supports LPDDR4x 1800 MHz. The video engine now also supports 10 bit videos as before 4k120 and VP9 de- and encoding. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 10nm LPP process the Exynos 8898 still used the 10nm LPE process that should also help with some of the performance Snapdragon 835 8998 ► remove from comparisonThe Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Mobile Platform MSM8998 is a high-end SoC for smartphones mostly Android based that was released early 2017. Its one of the first processors that is manufactured in 10 nm LPE FinFET at Samsung. The SD835 is the successor to the Snapdragon 821. It integrates 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for performance and 4x Kryo 280 at GHz max for efficiency. Furthermore offers an X16 LTE modem, WiFi, a dual-channel 32-Bit 1866 MHz LPDDR4x memory controller, an UFS controller, Hexagon 682 DSP, Spectra 180 Image Seonsor Prozessor, Bluetooth GPS, GLONASS, Baeidou, Galileo Satellite Exynos 9820 ► remove from comparisonThe Samsung Exynos 9 9820 is a mobile SoC for smartphones and tablets. It was announced late 2018 and was first integrated in the Samsung Galaxy S10 smartphones early 2019. The SoC integrates three clusters of processor cores with different architectures. Two big Samsung custom M4 cores clock up to GHz and deliver peak performance. Two additional ARM Cortex-A75 are also for performance tasks and clock at up to GHz. Finally, four small and power efficient ARM-Cortex A55 cores clock at up to GHz are in the third cluster. The different clusters can run simultaneously thanks to DinamIQ. The integrated LTE modem supports LTE-Advanced Pro 8CA 2 Gbps download, 3CA 316 Mbps upload. The integrated graphics card is a ARM Mali G76MP12 with 12 cores. The performance of the CPU part is positioned in the high end segment for smartphone processors. The single core performance is, thanks to the big custom cores, a strong suit of the CPU and reaches the levels of Apples mobile SoCs. The direct competitor Snapdragon 855 can be left behind in single-core benchmarks like Geekbench and operates on par in multi-core benchmarks. The predecessor Exynos 9810 can be bested by around 17% in our first benchmarks with the Galaxy S10 Plus. The SoC is produced at Samsung in the new 8nm LPP process that should also help with some of the performance Rating - Geekbench PCM Work, Sling Shot Physics, Antutu v8 CPU - Exynos 9820 Cinebench - Cinebench CPU Multi 64 BitCinebench - Cinebench CPU Single 64 BitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Single 32bitCinebench R10 - Cinebench R10 Rend. Multi 32bit3DMark 11 - 3DM11 Performance Physicsmin 1493 avg 1501 median 4% max 1508 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physicsmin 18756 avg 23944 median 26226 22% max 26851 Points min 6729 avg 19196 median 20406 17% max 23046 Points min 31297 avg 32016 median 27% max 32308 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Cloud Gate Physics3DMark - 3DMark Fire Strike Standard Physics3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2546 avg 2717 median 33% max 3120 Points min 1520 avg 2849 median 2969 37% max 3161 Points min 2925 avg 3123 median 38% max 3480 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot ES Unlimited Physicsmin 2561 avg 2752 median 38% max 3148 Points min 1631 avg 2766 median 2960 42% max 3189 Points min 3077 avg 3226 median 3087 44% max 3513 Points Geekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-CoreGeekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-CoreGeekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Single-Coremin 3688 avg 3721 median 3698 38% max 3776 Points min 1809 avg 1917 median 1920 20% max 1973 Points min 4499 avg 4510 median 47% max 4529 Points Geekbench - - Geekbench - 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 8786 avg 8874 median 8874 10% max 8963 Points min 6006 avg 6515 median 6517 7% max 6799 Points min 10162 avg 10366 median 10374 12% max 10553 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Single-Coremin 814 avg 1733 median 2021 29% max 2075 Points min 4881 avg 4958 median 71% max 5034 Points Geekbench - Geekbench 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 2952 avg 5482 median 15% max 6552 Points min 10000 avg 10109 median 10109 25% max 10218 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Coremin 5895 avg 5915 median 5915 9% max 5935 Points min 5674 avg 6126 median 6126 10% max 6578 Points min 7690 avg 7824 median 12% max 7957 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Coremin 1961 avg 1965 median 1965 29% max 1969 Points min 1933 avg 1954 median 1954 29% max 1975 Points min 2382 avg 2388 median 36% max 2393 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Coremin 3960 avg 4100 median 4100 7% max 4240 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Coremin 1144 avg 1155 median 1155 23% max 1166 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Streammin 895 avg 1039 median 1039 8% max 1183 Points min 1810 avg 2308 median 2308 19% max 2806 Points min 1870 avg 1985 median 16% max 2099 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Memorymin 1898 avg 2002 median 18% max 2105 Points min 2528 avg 3500 median 32% max 4471 Points min 2997 avg 3050 median 28% max 3102 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Floating Pointmin 10213 avg 10328 median 10328 20% max 10443 Points min 11609 avg 12054 median 24% max 12498 Points min 14240 avg 14552 median 14552 29% max 14864 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Integermin 5651 avg 5656 median 5656 11% max 5661 Points min 5777 avg 5936 median 12% max 6094 Points min 7271 avg 7404 median 15% max 7536 Points Geekbench 2 - 32 Bit - Geekbench Total Scoremin 6025 avg 6099 median 16% max 6172 Points min 7193 avg 7226 median 7226 19% max 7259 Points min 8338 avg 8493 median 22% max 8647 Points Mozilla Kraken - Kraken Total Score *min 2060 avg 2509 median 2394 3% max 3189 ms min 2425 avg 3219 median 3175 4% max 4813 ms min 1823 avg 1961 median 2% max 2240 ms Sunspider - Sunspider Total Score *min 210 avg median 3% max 387 ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Scoremin 12933 avg 14397 median 14% max 15233 Points min 3086 avg 11209 median 11484 11% max 14300 Points min 18697 avg 20121 median 19% max 20849 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Scoremin 63 avg median 68 16% max 72 Points AnTuTu v5 - AnTuTu v5 Total ScoreAnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Scoremin 214090 avg 218110 median 217950 74% max 222290 Points min 150208 avg 173235 median 175032 60% max 185487 Points min 269219 avg 275038 median 273831 93% max 283270 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEMmin 7800 avg 8235 median 8294 25% max 8612 Points min 8164 avg 9635 median 27% max 16148 Points min 12202 avg 12486 median 38% max 13096 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UXmin 53528 avg 55588 median 55698 68% max 57538 Points min 42180 avg 44325 median 53% max 47943 Points min 67209 avg 68326 median 68203 84% max 69689 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPUmin 91292 avg 92956 median 92887 29% max 94690 Points min 77533 avg 82910 median 83517 26% max 85868 Points min 148074 avg 148912 median 149162 46% max 149249 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPUmin 80534 avg 86884 median 88577 54% max 91540 Points min 68241 avg 71814 median 44% max 73371 Points min 97864 avg 99848 median 99722 61% max 102082 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Scoremin 236552 avg 243663 median 243861 43% max 250577 Points min 201881 avg 208685 median 208251 37% max 217442 Points min 327454 avg 329572 median 328778 58% max 333277 Points AnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 MEMAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 GPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 CPUAnTuTu v8 - AnTuTu v8 Total ScorePassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Testsmin 121702 avg 154312 median 154312 20% max 186922 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Visionmin 2385 avg 2407 median 2407 13% max 2429 Points min 3393 avg 3679 median 3705 20% max 3874 Points min 5013 avg 5063 median 5075 27% max 5101 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storagemin 5088 avg 5342 median 11% max 5595 Points min 3927 avg 4679 median 4655 10% max 5195 Points min 8407 avg 8786 median 8830 19% max 9121 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 5184 avg 5411 median 5305 35% max 5851 Points min 5603 avg 6743 median 44% max 7510 Points min 7595 avg 7769 median 7758 51% max 7966 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Scoremin 5736 avg 6022 median 5891 29% max 6571 Points min 6854 avg 7925 median 40% max 9927 Points min 9557 avg 9777 median 49% max 10008 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Battery Lifemin 476 avg 551 median 11% max 585 min Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9810 → 100% n=29Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 8998 → 102% n=29Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 9820 → 138% n=29 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics card - Average benchmark values for this graphics card* Smaller numbers mean a higher performance1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculationlog 12. 2221330 checking url part for id 9632 +0s ... 0s 1 checking url part for id 8554 +0s ... 0s 2 checking url part for id 11322 +0s ... 0s 3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s 4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Mon, 12 Jun 2023 135518 +0200 + ... 5 composed specs + ... 6 did output specs +0s ... 7 getting avg benchmarks for device 9632 + ... 8 got single benchmarks 9632 + ... 9 getting avg benchmarks for device 8554 + ... 10 got single benchmarks 8554 + ... 11 getting avg benchmarks for device 11322 + ... 12 got single benchmarks 11322 + ... 13 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 14 min, max, avg, median took s + ... 15 return log +0s ... We compared the performance of processors and found out that Samsung Exynos 9810 is better than Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 by It has 8 cores at GHz and an ARM Mali-G72 MP GPU versus 8 cores at GHz with Adreno 540. In the Antutu Benchmark test, Samsung Exynos 9810 results were faster than Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 by scoring 401884 points vs 278446 marks. In the 3DMark test, it scored 2343 points against 1069 , which is higher. It has a lower TDP of 5W 9W for its competitor, which means that devices based on this chip will heat up less during games and other complex tasks. The speed of the built-in modem in Samsung Exynos 9810 is better, 200 Mbps vs 150 Mbps so you'll get faster Internet service. In the tables below you will find more detailed information and you will be able to compare these CPUs, see the difference and be able to find which one is right for you. Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Benchmarks and Rankings Benchmark Samsung Exynos 9810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Difference Antutu 401884 278446 Geekbench 2033/681 1711/390 / 3Dmark 2343 1069 Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Gaming Performance Test Gaming test Samsung Exynos 9810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Difference PUBG Mobile 59 fps 58 fps PUBG New State 46 fps 48 fps Call of Duty Mobile 57 fps 56 fps Fortnite 28 fps 28 fps - Genshin Impact 37 fps 28 fps Mobile Legends Bang Bang 58 fps 55 fps Samsung Exynos 9810 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Specification Processor name Samsung Exynos 9810 Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Release Date 1/3/2018 03/22/2017 CPU Architecture 4x Exynos M3 + 4x Cortex-A55 4x Cortex-A73 + 4x Cortex-A53 Number of Cores 8 8 Clock Rate GHz GHz Chip technology 10 nm 10 nm GPU ARM Mali-G72 MP Adreno 540 The highest TDP 5 9 Memory 6 Gb 8 Gb Features Shannon 360 Snapdragon X16 Upload Speed up to 200 Mbps 150 Mbps Geekbench 6 Single-CoreGeekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, based on the concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The single-core benchmark only evaluates the performance of the fastest CPU core, the number of CPU cores in a processor is irrelevant 6 Multi-CoreGeekbench 6 is a benchmark for modern computers, notebooks and smartphones. What is new is an optimized utilization of newer CPU architectures, based on the concept and combining CPU cores of different sizes. The multi-core benchmark evaluates the performance of all of the processor's CPU cores. Virtual thread improvements such as AMD SMT or Intel's Hyper-Threading have a positive impact on the benchmark 5, 64bit Single-CoreGeekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The single-core test only uses one CPU core, the amount of cores or hyperthreading ability doesn't 5, 64bit Multi-CoreGeekbench 5 is a cross plattform benchmark that heavily uses the systems memory. A fast memory will push the result a lot. The multi-core test involves all CPU cores and taks a big advantage of - FP32 Performance Single-precision GFLOPSThe theoretical computing performance of the internal graphics unit of the processor with simple accuracy 32 bit in GFLOPS. GFLOPS indicates how many billion floating point operations the iGPU can perform per 8 BenchmarkThe AnTuTu 8 Benchmark measures the performance of a SoC. AnTuTu benchmarks the CPU, GPU, Memory as well as the UX User Experience by simulating browser and app usage. AnTuTu can benchmark any ARM CPU that runs under Android or iOS. Devices may not be directly compareable if the benchmark has been performed under different operating systems. In the AnTuTu 8 benchmark, the single-core performance of a processor is only slightly weighted. The evaluation consists of the multi-core performance of the processor, the speed of the RAM and the performance of the internal results for PassMark CPU MarkSome of the CPUs listed below have been benchmarked by CPU-monkey. However the majority of CPUs have not been tested and the results have been estimated by a CPU-monkey’s secret proprietary formula. As such they do not accurately reflect the actual Passmark CPU mark values and are not endorsed by PassMark Software Pty Ltd. In our leaderboards, we have clearly compiled the best processors for specific categories for you. The leaderboards are always up to date and are regularly updated by us. The best processors are selected according to popularity and speed in benchmarks as well as the price-performance ratio. 56 características comparadasQualcomm Snapdragon 835Samsung Exynos 9820Por que Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 é melhor que Samsung Exynos 9820?Clock do GPU 110MHz mais rápido?710MHzvs600MHzPossui NX bit? mais largura de banda de memória? que Samsung Exynos 9820 é melhor que Qualcomm Snapdragon 835?Velocidade RAM 267MHz maior?2133MHzvs1866MHzSemicondutor 2nm menor?8nmvs10nmDownloads mais rápidos?2000MBits/svs1024MBits/sUtiliza HMP?4GB a mais de tamanho máximo de memória?12GBvs8GBCarregamento mais rápido?316MBits/svs150MBits/s2 canais de memória a mais?4vs2Avaliações de usuáriosClassificação geralQualcomm Snapdragon 8354 Avaliações de usuáriosQualcomm Snapdragon Avaliações de usuáriosSamsung Exynos 98202 Avaliações de usuáriosSamsung Exynos Avaliações de usuáriosRecursoInformações geraisUm sistema operacional 32-bit pode suportar, no máximo, 4GB de RAM. Sistemas 64-bit permite mais do que 4GB, proporcionando maior desempenho. Também é possível executar aplicativos uma placa de vídeo integrada, você não precisa comprar uma placa pequenos proporcionam melhor desempenho e menor consumo de energia. Chipsets com um maior número de transistores, componentes semicondutores de dispositivos eletrônicos, oferecem mais poder computacional. Um fator de forma pequeno permite que mais transistores se encaixem em um chip, aumentando, assim, seu unidade de processamento gráfico GPU tem uma velocidade de clock mais DirectX é usado em games, com as versões mais novas suportando gráficos tecnologia sem fio 5G. A rede móvel de quinta geração oferece velocidades mais altas e latência menor do que a rede de quarta geração GPU Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Quando a GPU está rodando abaixo de suas limitações, ela pode aumentar a velocidade para um clock superior a fim de fornecer desempenho OpenGL ES é usado para games em dispositivos móveis, tais como smartphones. As versões mais recentes suportam gráficos aplicativos usam OpenCL para desfrutar do poder da unidade de processamento de gráficos GPU para computação não gráfica. As versões mais recentes introduzem mais funcionalidade e melhor velocidade da CPU ou processador indica quantos ciclos de processamento podem ser executados por uma CPU a cada segundo, considerando todos os seus núcleos unidades de processamento. Essa velocidade é calculada pela soma da capacidade de cada núcleo – ou, no caso de processadores multinúcleos que empregam diferentes microarquiteturas, de cada grupo de threads resulta em desempenho mais rápido e melhor a tecnologia um chip pode alternar entre dois conjuntos de núcleos de processador, a fim de maximizar o desempenho do aparelho e a duração da bateria. Durante uma partida de jogo, por exemplo, os núcleos mais potentes são utilizados para otimizar a performance, enquanto o ato de checar e-mails aciona núcleos menos potentes para prolongar a duração da Multiprocessamento Heterogêneo HMP - "Heterogenous Multi-Processing" é uma versão mais avançada da tecnologia Nesta configuração, o processador pode utilizar todos os núcleos ao mesmo tempo, ou apenas um núcleo para tarefas de baixa intensidade. Isso pode, respectivamente, fornecer desempenho mais potente ou prolongar a duração da turbo do clock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Quando a CPU estiver rodando abaixo de suas limitações, ela pode acelerar a velocidade de clock para oferecer desempenho L2 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Um cache L2 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um L1 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Um cache L1 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um de clock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820O multiplicador de clock controla a velocidade da L3 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Um cache L3 maior resulta em uma CPU mais rápida e no sistema como um suportar memória mais rápida, fornecendo melhor desempenho ao memória DDR Double Data Rate é o tipo mais comum de memória RAM. As versões mais recentes de memória DDR suportam velocidades máximas mais altas e consomem menos quantidade máxima de memória RAM.Esta é a taxa máxima de dados que podem ser lidos ou armazenados na canais de memória aumenta a velocidade de transferência de dados entre a memória e a eMMC Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Um versão mais elevada de eMMC permite interfaces de memória mais rápidos, o que tem um efeito positivo no desempenho do dispositivo. Por exemplo, quando transfere arquivos de seu computador para um armazenamento interno usando código corretor de erros de memória pode detectar e corrigir dados corrompidos. Ele é usado quando é essencial evitar corrupção, tal como em computação científica ou ao se executar um sistema em um chip SoC tem um chip celular LTE integrado. O LTE é capaz de fazer downloads a velocidades mais rápidas do que a antiga tecnologia velocidade de download é uma medida da largura de banda da conexão à internet, representando a taxa máxima de transferência de dados em que um dispositivo pode acessar conteúdo velocidade de upload é uma medida da largura de banda da conexão à internet, representando a taxa máxima de transferência de dados em que um dispositivo pode enviar informações para um servidor ou outro tecnologia integrada no processador para proteger o dispositivo para uso com ferramentas como pagamentos móveis e streaming de vídeo usando gerenciamento de direitos digitais DRM.A tecnologia multithreading como Hyperthreading da Intel ou Multithreading Simultâneo da AMD fornece um maior desempenho dividindo cada um dos núcleos físicos do processador em núcleos virtuais, também conhecidos como threads. Dessa forma, cada núcleo pode executar dois fluxos de instruções ao mesmo bit ajuda a proteger o computador de ataques fornece aceleração para processamento de mídia, tal como escutar AES é usado para acelerar a criptografia e a VFP Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Vector Floating-Point VFP é usado pelo processador para entregar desempenho aumentado em áreas tais como imagem 5 é um benchmark multiplataforma que mede o desempenho de núcleo único de um processador. Fonte Primate Labs, 2023Geekbench 5 é um benchmark multiplataforma que mede o desempenho de múltiplos núcleos de um processador. Fonte Primate Labs, 2023resultado PassMark Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU usando múltiplas PassMark único Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU usando uma única PassMark em overclock Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 Desconhecido. Ajude-nos sugerindo um valor. Samsung Exynos 9820Este índice de referência mede o desempenho da CPU enquanto ela está com Snapdragon 8 Gen 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Plus Gen 1MediaTek Dimensity 9200 PlusQualcomm Snapdragon 7c Plus Gen 3Exibir tudo

snapdragon 835 vs exynos 9810